|
Rijksmuseum
Kröller-Müller Exhibition,
July - September 1969
Catalog Essay
by Peter Struycken
Expression in visual
art occurs when the various factors that are recognizable in the work
because of their connections with one another obtain their specific expression.
In works of high quality all the factors employed seem to be connected
unequivocally. This connection is the work's expression. The factors employed
are related to the entirety in such a way that they cannot be isolated
from it, or changed, without this causing an alteration in the expression.
This alteration of expression is greater or smaller according to the degree
to which the changed factor is decisive for the expression of the entirety.
A condition for expression in visual art is that the relationship of the
factors employed can be visually perceived.
It is not surprising,
then, that regulation of relationships in a work occurs on a basis of
visual criteria. These visual criteria become recognizable in the work
itself, and are extremely closely connected with the desired expression,
In Kenneth Snelson's work, however, the remarkable fact is that the criteria
for the factor-relationships in his work do not primarily proceed from
visually expressive motives, but from technical ones. In his work the
visually perceptible relationships of direction, number, size, form and
material are immediately recognizable as relationships necessary for the
function - i.e. stability - and determined by mechanics. It is not because
of visual criteria that it is impossible to add or omit an element, to
make an element bigger or smaller, to change an element's direction, but
because the connection between the rods and wires responsible for the
stability are technically determined in such a way that this stability
would cease to exist if suchw things were done. Stability is used as an
end in itself. In no aspect whatsoever does it serve a particular purpose
such as for instance the stability of a crane or bridge. Here, stability
is both the means and the end of expression. The components of the form
derive their visually recognizable context from their function and from
the technical conditions connected with its realisation. Relationships
between direction, number, size, form and material yield a new visually
perceptible relationship principle because of their functional self-evidence.
This results in an extension of our capacity of judging and experiencing
relationships. Recognizability of function and construction become the
norm for visual expression. And that is a sensational occurence.
|